Losing Weight

“This new information should focus weight loss approaches on reducing calorie intake rather than any particular proportions of fat, protein or carbohydrate,” said Frank. M. Sacks M.D, professor of cardiovascular disease prevention in the nutrition department at the Harvard School of Public Health, which was one of the groups that conducted the POUNDS LOST study.

I remember a few years back, my then husband was trying the Atkins diet and I was steadfastly trying to stick to my Weight-Watchers. When he was pressuring me to switch, I said I thought it didn’t really matter which you followed – if you just cut down on calories, you’d lose weight. It just comes down to choosing what approach best suits your tastes.

“These results show that, as long as people follow a heart-healthy, reduced-calorie diet, there is more than one nutritional approach to achieving and maintaining a healthy weight,” said Elizabeth G. Nabel, M.D. and director at the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, which funded the study.

Interestingly, the study found that not only was weight loss the same between the diet approaches, it also found the improvement in risk factors was also the same. Improved risk factors include reduced levels of triglycerides, LDL (bad) cholesterol, lowered blood pressure, and increased HDL (good) cholesterol. All the diets also reduced the presence of metabolic syndrome, high blood pressure and high blood sugar.

Not that any of that makes it any easier to cut down on the calories!

Sixty-six percent of Americans are overweight and of those 32 percent are obese. I’m one of those 66 percent but not the 32 percent, and every year I resolve to shed those extra pounds. Five years ago I was about 20 pounds lighter than I am now – that was after about two years of serious Weight-Watchers. I even made it to lifetime member! I wish I could blame the weight gain on the divorce but it’s been almost two years since that and the trend hasn’t reversed. Wish there was an easy way to do this ……

You can get sample menus from the study from the NHLBI. There also a cool menu planner to help you count those pesky calories.


View Photos of Singles - Match.com
  • http://blog.sciencegeekgirl.com Stephanie Chasteen

    Bob Parks (a very funny physicist) deems that idea that “weight loss is caused by eating less calories” the “physics” plan (since it is just a statement of conservation of energy). Here’s what he wrote recently:

    1. WEIGHT-LOSS: SCIENCE CONFIRMS THE “PHYSICS PLAN“.
    Atkins, Pritikin, Jennie Craig, South Beach, NutriSystem . . . all had one
    thing in common: they made their inventors very rich. But how could it be
    that every diet plan seems to work? It’s nothing but consciousness-
    raising; any plan will make people aware of how much they’re shoveling
    in. Nine years ago, however, WN came out with the “physics plan.” The
    plan is based on the Conservation of Energy: “burn more calories than you
    consume” http://www.bobpark./WN00/wn022500.html . Don’t be fooled by
    cheap imitations. On Wednesday, the New England Journal of Medicine
    published the results of a two year study of 800 overweight adults.
    Headed by Frank Sacks of the Harvard School of Public Health, the study
    confirmed that people lose weight if they cut calories; it doesn’t matter
    if the calories are fat, carbohydrates, or protein. That, of course, is
    the WN “physics plan.”

  • http://admin mandywalkerco

    Hi, Stephanie – Thanks for the “physics plan” link – I’m going to have to check it out although I was never very good at physics in school…. !